Talk:Era of Good Feelings
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Era of Good Feelings article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Good Feelings make-over
[edit]In response to the request that the article bear upon the "actual phrase" (see "cleanup" above), I've rewritten the article to that effect. This is not a bio of Monroe's life, nor a review of his two terms in office. Only that history bearing most upon the "good feelings" motif was retained or developed. The key fact that the era was an interlude between the First and Second Party system is emphasized, and the necessity of resurrecting a North/South alliance along the Old Republicans basis. See sources.
Conservapediots are encouraged to update the Conservapedia page on this topic using these sources, or simply copy and paste this revised Wiki article for best results. 36hourblock (talk) 19:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Infobox Image
[edit]The Wikipedia Manual of Style section on Choosing images states "Images must be relevant to the article that they appear in and be significantly and directly related to the article's topic." The Bingham painting (incorrectly called The Jolly Flatboatmen, which was the title of Bingham's 1846 work; this 1857 image is titled Jolly Flatboatmen in Port) was painted over 20 years after the end of the Era of Good Feelings, it does not portray any event or person related to the Era of Good Feelings, therefore it is not relevant to the article. It does not matter that an author chose to use it for the cover of his book on the Era of Good Feelings, authors/publishers have wide latitude to choose unrelated public domain paintings to put on the covers of books for aesthetic and/or marketing reasons, Wikipedia editors have no such latitude and are bound by the Manual of Style. I have deleted the image. Mmyers1976 (talk) 21:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Update, added "We Owe Allegiance To No Crown" from 1814, a much more appropriate image. It is from the era or directly preceding it, it is referential in its subject to the War of 1812 which the lead section acknowledge's US victory in began the Era of good Feelings, and it depicts the American nationalism and pride that characterized the era. Mmyers1976 (talk) 22:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Second update - added an even better picture from 1819 that shows Americans celebrating their national pride together. Mmyers1976 (talk) 23:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
"prolong" their inevitable decline?
[edit]Quote:
Monroe stated that if he appointed a Federalist he would prolong their inevitable decline and fall.
The above statement is illogical. You can delay or postpone the inevitable but "prolong" makes no sense here. If Monroe did use that word, then we should either quote it or replace with a more logical word. 85.193.252.19 (talk) 14:35, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Adding comments to this talk page
[edit]I'm hereby reverting a set of recent changes to this talk page made by Lord Milner. These included alterations to comments. Observe Editing others' comments and Editing your own comments. Lord Milner (or anyone else): You are welcome to add your own comments, and of course these may include arguments against others' comments. Your additions should be signed and dated, so that there will be no uncertainty about who wrote what, or when. -- Hoary (talk) 22:57, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in History
- C-Class vital articles in History
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class United States History articles
- Mid-importance United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class history articles
- Low-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Mid-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles